A Guardian investigation found Google's AI Overviews displayed false and misleading health information across multiple medical topics. AI summaries gave incorrect liver function test ranges sourced from an Indian hospital chain without accounting for nationality, sex, or age. The feature advised pancreatic cancer patients to avoid high-fat foods, which experts said could increase mortality risk. Stanford and MIT researchers called the absence of prominent disclaimers a critical danger. Google removed some AI Overviews for health queries after the investigation, but many remained active.

Heber City Police Department's AI report tool transcribed background dialogue from The Princess and the Frog into an official report, claiming an officer had transformed into a frog.

Deloitte admitted AI-generated errors in a commissioned Australian government report and agreed to refund the fee.

Anthropic accepted a $1.5 billion settlement with authors who said the Claude team scraped pirate e-book sites to train its chatbot. The deal pays roughly $3,000 per book across 500,000 works, heads off a December trial, and forces one of the richest AI startups to bankroll the writing community it previously treated as free training data.

Threat actors pushed an AI-generated npm package that acted as a wallet drainer, emptying Solana users’ funds.

A King Features syndicated summer reading list used AI and included nonexistent books. It appeared in the Chicago Sun-Times and one edition of the Philadelphia Inquirer before corrections and apologies.

Sports Illustrated faced criticism after product review articles appeared under profiles with AI-looking headshots and shifting bylines; content was removed and a partner relationship ended.

Microsoft Start auto-attached an AI ‘Insights’ poll speculating on a woman’s death beside a Guardian story.

Gannett halted Lede AI high-school recaps after robotic, error-prone stories went viral.

CNET paused and reviewed AI-generated money articles after multiple factual errors were found.